|
Subject: Human Rights
Abuses in Lebanon
The following report briefly summarizes the concerted campaign
of Human Rights attacks and abuses perpetrated against the
Christian population, particularly those belonging to the
Lebanese Forces Party, by the regime in Lebanon from 1991 to
1998.
The Information Center, Human
Rights Department issues this report.
The Lebanese Forces:
“The Backbone and Mainstay of the
Free Christian Existence”.
A concentrated and deliberate campaign of Human Rights
Abuses and political persecution directed against the Lebanese
Forces
Throughout the
1990’s by the current regime in Lebanon.
Foreword
The Lebanese forces, after
the outbreak of the 1975 war throughout Lebanon, was
established to become the major Christian resistance force
and defender of the Christian Faith in the hostile Middle
East.
The L.F. developed
initially as a disciplined military fighting force and
progressed to become a protector of the weak and
disadvantaged and a provider for the needy within the
Christian community. It progressed, after the regional and
international guarantees of the Taef Agreement, to become a
legal democratic political party representing the
aspirations of most Christians in Lebanon and it willingly
disbanded its military machine concentrating instead on
promoting and developing socio-political programs.
We
believe that the regime of the former President of Lebanon
Mr. Elias Harewi acted in direct contravention of the
following articles of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights:
·
Article 2
·
Article 3
·
Article 5
·
Article 7
·
Article 8
·
Article 9
·
Article 10
·
Article 11 (1)
·
Article 12
·
Article 18
·
Article 19
·
Article 20
·
Article 21
INTRODUCTION
According
to the internationally sponsored Taif Agreement of 1989
National Reconciliation and dialogue were adopted as the
themes that would dominate the often conflict ridden
relationship between the Christian community and the Moslem
one which throughout the 1970s and 1980s resulted in often
violent and armed confrontation and conflict.
The main
aspects of the Agreement centered around the dissolution of
all militias, Lebanese and non-Lebanese, the withdrawal of all
foreign forces, the formation of a government of National
Unity, free and democratic parliamentary elections, reform of
the government constitution and institutions including army,
internal security forces, judiciary, local government, General
Amnesty for war crimes, etc.
In fact
all of the points of agreement reached in the Taif Agreement
(on this basis the Lebanese Forces laid down its arms and
entered into the peace process and political dialogue) have
been cast aside and National Reconciliation not implemented.
The Harewi regime, in fact, utilised the presence of foreign
forces in Lebanon to treat the Christian Community as
vanquished and losers of the Lebanese War that actually ended
in stalemate.
In
reality, the Christian militias were disbanded whilst the
Islamic militias such as Hizbullah and the Ahbache
Fundamentalist Movement, and non Lebanese militias such as
Palestinian groups, Iranian Revolutionary Guards, the P.K.K.
Kurdish Movement and others were maintained and legitimized by
the Harewi Regime and foreign troops remained on Lebanese
territory despite all the regional and international
guarantees.
The
General Amnesty Law that was implemented in 1992 actually
excluded the Christians and was used in 1994 to persecute them
illegally. This attempt to subjugate the Christians began by
marginalising the Church (the only Christian institution that
remained relatively operational) and subduing the Lebanese
Forces and all Christian political parties (which began in
earnest in 1994 after the bombing of Sayidat Al Najjat/Our
Lady of Deliverance Church).
A flawed
and unbalanced naturalisation decree was announced in 1994 by
the Harewi regime where around 400,000 non-Lebanese, 90% of
whom were Muslims from Arab countries were given citizenship
in a wholesale and indiscriminant manner, hence, leading to a
huge demographic change and altering the existing and delicate
balance in Christian-Muslim numbers.
Christian war refugees remained displaced and persecuted
whilst other non-Christian refugees were compensated with
large amounts of money to vacate government and some Christian
properties. The primary reason for this discrimination against
the Christian displaced was the fact that the person appointed
to head the Ministry of the Displaced, Mr. Walid Jumblat,
caused during the war the displacement of most of these
Christians whom he refuses to repatriate to their homes. Most
of those Christians incidentally happen to have originally
resided in Jumblat’s self declared fiefdom. Rather than use
the budget for repatriating these Christians the money was
dispensed to his followers most of who continue to occupy
these Christian properties.
The
Harewi Regime also targeted Christian institutions including
Media and educational institutions, health services,
investment companies, etc. especially those owned by the
Lebanese Forces party, members and supporters. Many of these
institutions were confiscated, closed or economically and
politically pressured into bankruptcy or forced to cede
control to government supporters (E.g. Saint Anthony School
for the needy, Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation, Radio Free
Lebanon, the Health Cooperative, Slia Printers, etc.).
Institutions owned by the Catholic Church such as the
Television station (Tele Lumiere) and two radio stations have
been continuously subjected to pressure and intimidation and
the axe of closure held over their heads.
Other
Christian institutions such as AUXILIA, a Humanitarian
Charitable organization that specializes in promoting and
obtaining a monthly sponsorship for orphans and children of
disabled parents for education and health purposes, was also
recently subjected to a campaign of harassment and several of
its offices closed.
The
Harewi Regime also issued a decree to shut down all branches
of the Lebanese University and other government colleges in
the Christian districts whilst the branches of these
educational institutions remain open in non-Christian areas.
Another
matter of note is the selective prohibition of the right to
demonstrate. Demonstrations and even religious processions
were banned in the Christian regions especially in Christian
opposition strongholds. On the other hand, demonstrations of
support for government figures and shooting in the air on a
number of occasions were allowed by the Harewi Regime and the
regime conveniently on several occasions allowed
demonstrations including the public display of military
weapons by Hizbullah and other non-Christian groups.
The 1992
Parliamentary Elections were boycotted by 87% of all Lebanese
including 94% of Christians due to the seriously flawed
Election Law highlighted by its blatant gerrymandering which
allowed Muslim voters to influence the election of Christian
candidates whereas Christians were not allowed the same
privilege. The result was an unrepresentative Parliament.
Again in 1996, the Parliamentary Elections were dominated by
gerrymandering and fraud in favour of the regime’s candidates,
who resorted this time to the use of the votes of the
illegally naturalised aliens and deceased voters.
THE PRELUDE: 1992-1994
The
campaign of harassment by the Harewi Regime against the
Christians in general and the Lebanese Forces Party in
particular began to gather pace and intensify gradually from
1992. The main reason was the fact that Dr. Samir Geagea
steadfastly refused to participate in successive unbalanced
and corrupt governments whose members were primarily concerned
with advancing their own narrow agendas and interests and who
refused to abide by the terms of the Taif Agreement and
implement its main features especially those relating to
sovereignty, independence and the interests of the nation and
the general public.
During
1992, the Harewi Regime’s security services commenced their
direct attacks upon the Lebanese Forces and their supporters
in order to force Dr. Geagea, the Leader of the Lebanese
Forces Party to cooperate with the regime and withdraw his
opposition to its unbalanced and corrupt policies. A number of
Lebanese Forces officials including Elie Daw, Sami Abou Jawde,
Nadim Abd El Nour and Joseph Akiki were assassinated and in
September of 1992 a prominent supporter of Dr. Samir Geagea
and member of the Kataeb Party, Mr. Boutros Khawand was
kidnapped in broad daylight and his fate remains unknown until
this very day. Also the security forces illegally stormed the
head office of the Lebanese Forces Party Students Union
arresting more than 40 students without warrants.
Throughout the period leading to
1994, most L.F. activities and functions were subjected to
direct pressure from the Security Forces and in all instances
these disruptions were illegal and unprovoked. On a number of
occasions Lebanese Forces gatherings, social, cultural and
political were fired upon or grenades thrown at their offices.
The Lebanese Forces, despite all this harassment remained
unwavering to its commitment to a free and democratic
pluralistic Lebanon.
Another major symbol of the
Christian Resistance throughout the war was represented by the
Headquarters of the Command in the Karantina District.
However, negotiations at the time (1992) were in progress
between Dr. Samir Geagea and government officials on plans for
the Lebanese Forces. to abandon certain sections of the
complex belonging to the government. The final touches were
put together by the minister Shauki Fakhouri and Dr. Samir
Geagea for a timetable that would have resulted in an orderly
return of government owned sections to its rightful owner.
However, only a few hours later despite all clear intentions
that a peaceful evacuation would have taken place, thousands
of Army Troops surrounded the L.F. complex and threatened to
enter it by force. Dr. Geagea again intervened and proposed a
peaceful settlement to the matter evacuating immediately the
whole complex including the sections they were entitled to
remain in legally, thus preventing an armed conflict that
would have resulted in hundreds of casualties (other
government establishments occupied during the war by Muslim
militias such as Beit Ed Dein in the Chouf remain under the
control of these militias without government interference).
The motive of the regime was to intimidate the Lebanese Forces
into an armed incident. By now the Regimes intentions had
become quite clear. Their message to the L.F.; submit to the
policies of the Harewi Regime or be prepared for further
retribution.
THE BOMBING OF SAYDET AL NAJJAT
CHURCH
(OUR LADY OF DELIVERANCE)
A pretext had to be created to
dissolve and disband the powerful Lebanese Forces Party and
its economic lifeline to the ever increasingly besieged
Christian Community. Throughout 1993, the Christian Community,
especially the L.F., continued to suffer at the hands of the
Regime. Illegal and unprovoked attacks continued against
political and economic targets of the L.F. Hundreds of
personnel were, on a regular basis, arbitrarily arrested
without warrants and subjected to beatings and torture. But
this all failed to brake the Lebanese Forces’ resolve and its
duty to its Christian Community. For it, only, remained as the
last line of defense against a hostile and vicious Regime.
In June 1993, a Ecumenical
Seminar at the Balamand Monastery in North Lebanon became the
target of a terrorist attack. The perpetrators turned out to
be Islamic Extremists who had planned to decimate a gathering
of Bishops and Priests from all the Christian denominations in
Lebanon, so as to prevent and damage a process of dialogue and
cooperation between all the Christian Churches, which in
effect would lead to a stronger and united Christian Front
(later, in 1996 President Harewi pardoned these terrorists).
In nearby Tripoli an active ban on Christmas Celebrations was
implemented by fundamentalists and several Christian owned
businesses were burnt or bombed and Christian churches and
cemeteries were desecrated.
The Harewi Regime, after
exhausting all means at its disposal to crush the Christian
resistance, resorted to the final card in its grasp. The next
chapter was the bombing of the Catholic Maronite Church in
Zouk Mikhael on 27 February 1994 in which the regime hoped to
bring the Christians, especially the Lebanese Forces, to their
knees and also turn Christian upon Christian, and to deter
Pope John Paul II from visiting Lebanon. The Lebanese Regime
now stepped up its campaign of terror against the Christian
Districts. It silenced the Media (TV, Radio, and Press) and
banned all news broadcasts and political programs. For most
totalitarian Dictatorships, the concept of the “Free Media” is
an unfortunate circumstance, especially one which is
uncensored and not under government control. To cover its
illegal activities the Regime had to achieve a total news
blackout, which it in effect maintained for a number of
months.
Once the Media was controlled,
the Army and Security Forces laid siege to a number of
Christian Districts including the political headquarters of
the Lebanese Forces in Ghadras falsely accusing Dr. Samir
Geagea and the L.F. of planning the bombing. In April Dr.
Geagea was arrested along (a few weeks after his second in
command Fouad Malek was detained) with several other L.F.
members. Of those initially accused, some had been dead for
some years whilst others had left Lebanon several months
earlier i.e. in 1992 and 1993. Fouad Malek who had visited the
Maronite Patriarch in relation to the church bombing was
illegally seized only hours later from his home and taken to
the Ministry of Defense (released in 1997).
On 13/3/1994, the Lebanese
Forces Party was illegally dissolved before any formal charges
were laid. Their properties and bank accounts were illegally
seized and confiscated. Dr. Samir Geagea (after rejecting
requests to leave Lebanon) and his fellow comrades were
detained in the Ministry of Defense, all without arrest
warrants (Lebanese Law declares that detention without warrant
is illegal after 48 hours) and held in a non-legal prison.
Many of the detainees were blindfolded and thrown into the
trunks of military vehicles and were forced under continuous
torture to incriminate themselves and their comrades in the
church massacre only to be released days later with no charges
being filed, while lawyers were denied the right to see them
for the duration of their detention. At that time the Ministry
of Defense prison was neither a legal nor an official prison
nor was it under the Jurisdiction of the Justice Ministry. But
to the Harewi Regime, the Constitution and Law of the Land
became irrelevant.
In the days following the church
bombing, the Christians Districts were subjected to an Army
siege whilst the Secret Police set about house to house
searches seizing hundreds of Christians among them Georges El
Khoury who was to be used as the centerpiece of their false
charges and fabrications. Georges El Khoury, the Regime
alleged, under orders from the L.F. command and in
collaboration with the Israeli’s, meticulously planned and
carried out the terrorist attack along with Tony Obeid, Jean
Chahine, and Rushdi Raad. Later when he appeared in Court for
the beginning of the trials, Georges El Khoury, claimed that
all confessions he allegedly signed were forced upon him by
means of torture and beatings. Also members of his family were
threatened including his brother who was allegedly tortured in
front of him, in order that he sign the fabricated
confessions. Obeid, Chahine (Chahine’s sister, Antoinette, was
also held by the Authorities to put pressure on him to
return), and Raad, left Lebanon prior to 1994. The Australian,
Cypriot, and Canadian Foreign Affairs Departments subsequently
confirmed their presence in those respective Countries at the
time the Harewi Regime alleged they were in Lebanon planning
and carrying out the bombing operation.
Meanwhile, Dr. Geagea was held
in prison illegally in solitary confinement in direct
contravention of Lebanese Law which states that no prisoner
shall be held in solitary confinement for more than 10 days
(in fact Dr. Geagea has been in solitary confinement for more
than 1700 successive days).
Human Rights conditions
continued to deteriorate with the Security Forces continuing
to use excessive force and torturing detainees, specifically
members of the Lebanese Forces who continued to oppose the
tyrannical policies of the Harewi Regime. Arbitrary arrests
continued and hundreds of L.F. members were seized and forced
to sign statements declaring that they will no longer enter
political life or be involved in any political activity in
direct contravention of Lebanon’s Constitution. The Regime’s
Intelligence Units infringed upon the citizens right of
privacy. Telephones were bugged and mail opened including that
of the Maronite Patriarch. Bkerki, the See of the Maronite
Catholic Patriarch, was sealed off by government troops and
Christians prevented from entering and carrying their
complaints of mistreatment to the Patriarch and later after
the siege was lifted people visiting there regularly were
quite often arrested and interrogated. Bans were imposed upon
assemblies and demonstrations. Gatherings outside churches
were prohibited and religious processions banned. The Economic
Viability of the Christian Regions, which was previously
upheld by the Lebanese Forces, was severely undermined by the
Regime.
The Church bombing case was but
a catalyst for further fabricated charges against the Lebanese
Forces and amazingly as such trials were taking place, the
President Mr. Harewi passed a decree declaring amnesty to all
drug traffickers and dealers (more than 40,000).
In May
1998, municipal elections took place for the first time in
over 30 years. Surprisingly, but possibly due to International
pressures, the elections were relatively democratic for that
part of the world. As expected and because of limited
interference by the Harewi regime’s security forces,
government candidates were annihilated and the victors were
from predominantly opposition parties and groups. In the
Christian districts the majority of victorious candidates were
pro Lebanese Forces.
Due to the overwhelming victory
in these elections it was expected that the Lebanese regime
would retaliate against the Lebanese Forces. And so they did
with the assassination of a former Lebanese Forces officer and
his friend in a car bomb in the Dora District of Beirut. The
Harewi regime with its usual cunning took advantage of the
Dora car bomb incident to initiate a new crackdown and a fresh
round of arbitrary arrests and a new wave of persecution
against the L.F. in retaliation for their election victories.
In order to implicate the L.F. once again, they decided to
proceed with a new plot to discredit the Lebanese Forces both
in Lebanon and abroad. Hence, they fabricated the tale of the
L.F. office in Australia, with the backing of the Israelis,
allegedly masterminding and plotting a wave of terrorist
attacks in Lebanon. Since the Australian office of the L.F.
has been one of the most vocal and active proponents of Human
Rights issues in Lebanon, the Harewi regime decided it was
essential to discredit the Australian office specifically and
hence, deter members from Australia from returning to Lebanon.
In the words of the regime, the Lebanese Forces Australian
office was damaging the image of Lebanon internationally.
Mr. Steve Stanton, an
Australian barrister was black listed and prevented from
entering Lebanon because of his defense of Dr. Samir Geagea.
Also, Mr. Tony Chidiac, executive member of the L.F. Political
Council was twice convicted of political crimes against the
Lebanese State whilst residing in Australia and sentenced in
absentia to 30 years jail with hard labor.
Currently, Dr. Geagea and the Lebanese Forces are facing an
ongoing trial for the alleged assassination of former Prime
Minister Rachid Karami again with the same scenario of
previously fabricated cases. It is to be noted here that the
brother of the late Mr. Karami, Omar, appointed Dr. Samir
Geagea as a Minister to his government in 1992. Would Mr. Omar
Karami have appointed Dr. Geagea to his cabinet if he indeed
believed Dr. Geagea was responsible for his brother’s
assassination in 1987?!
CONCLUSION
As many
countries around the World made progress towards Human Rights
reforms and improvements, Lebanon appears to have plunged
deeper into the Dark Ages of Human rights standards in the
nine years of rule by the Harewi Regime. What we in the
civilised World perceive to be as basic Human Rights and take
for granted, in countries such as Lebanon such rights have
been deemed to be a privilege, reserved for the few of the
ruling elite of a backward feudal society.
It would
take but a few words to sum up the disease that has racked
Lebanon’s ruling regime throughout the previous nine years of
President Harewi’s rule: “ preservation of the self”. These
elements, it seems, were prepared to reach out to the devil in
order to preserve their feudal and tyrannical powers and their
ill-together wealth. This coupled with the intolerant
fundamentalist Islamic tide sweeping the region has put the
innocent and victimized Christian community at a sword’s edge.
What could
not be achieved against the Christians in war was revived
through a new phoney war, not unlike Hitler’s campaign prior
to the official outbreak of World War II where his armies had
seized near to half of Europe before the rest of the World
awoke from its slumber and became alerted to the danger. The
Christian community of Lebanon is today facing a three-edged
sword, an unholy alliance of Feudalists, Fundamentalists, and
foreign occupiers, who are hell bent on removing the only
obstacle to their ambitious claims in Lebanon. The spearhead
of this obstacle is obviously Dr. Samir Geagea, leader of the
Christian Lebanese Forces Party.
Dr. Samir
Geagea, leader of this Free Christian Movement, remains in
captivity today, as a prisoner of conscience, a political
prisoner in solitary confinement, several metres underground
in a tiny cell isolated from natural air and light where he
has spent many a sleepless night listening to the cries of
pain from his tortured Christian comrades in nearby torture
chambers. Only his powerful Christian Faith has kept him alive
in such a degrading and inhumane environment up until this
day, for any other normal human being would have either
perished or become detached from sanity.
Perhaps if
this faithful Christian man –faithful to his community,
faithful to the thousands of Christian martyrs and faithful to
his country- had succumbed to the temptations of greed and
treachery he might have bore false witness and compromised the
freedom of his people, the independence and sovereignty of his
country, the principles of democracy. He, however, rejected
this path of dishonor and remained true to his pledge
maintaining his loyalty to his fellow Christians and to his
country. For this he was made the scapegoat and primary target
of persecution. He, along with his fellow Christian comrades,
were falsely accused and unfairly judged. They were made to
pay for the sins and crimes of others. They were paraded
before mock courts and judged by a biased and controlled
judiciary in trials reminiscent of the farces of the KGB
controlled courts of the former Communist Bloc in East Europe.
Dr.
Geagea, along with his comrades, were put through this mockery
of a judicial system and falsely charged and imprisonment for
their persistence in demanding an independent and sovereign
Lebanon, and for demanding true National Reconciliation after
the devastating war of 1970’s and 1980’s, for democracy, for
freedom of the Media, independence of the Judiciary, for
equality of all before a just Law, an end to the deeply
embedded and systematic corruption, fraud, nepotism and
cronyism associated with an outdated feudal system
overshadowing Lebanon since the Middle Ages. But perhaps the
severest reprimand was for his daring to acknowledge the
reality of the make-up of Lebanon’s society and the need for
proper dialogue between the Christian and Muslim communities
and the need to establish a system of government which
facilitates co-existence between two widely different
communities and accommodates their wishes, hopes and beliefs
without either community infringing upon the rights of the
other.
It is as
if those who control the key of Dr. Geagea’s political
imprisonment desire to see Lebanon in a state of continuous
conflict by crushing anyone who dares to propose an
everlasting grassroots solution to Lebanon’s history of
sectarian and political strife.
The newly
elected President of the Republic of Lebanon, Mr. Emil Lahoud
in his acceptance speech after being sworn in as Lebanon’s 10th
Head of State on the 14th of November emphasized
the need to respect the Law and implement the Law since “the
language of the Law is often absent and often purposely
ignored”. “There will be no future for anyone… without the
rise of the State of Laws and Institutions within a democratic
parliamentary system”. “People are yearning for change and
their reasons are both known and legitimate”. “They the people
are rightfully seeking an honest judiciary, independent of all
forms of intervention or influence on its members or
rulings…”,“People, and especially youth, want attention paid
to humanitarian issues…”.
These
comments by President Lahoud further consolidate our
legitimate claims that the former regime of President Harewi
persecuted the Lebanese Forces and its leader Dr. Samir Geagea
for political motives and committed abhorrent Human Rights
abuses against innocent law abiding Christians as a means to
suppress and subdue all legitimate political opposition to
Harewi’s dictatorial rule.
President
Lahoud has indeed acknowledged the need for reform within
Lebanon and we the Lebanese Forces Party call upon the UN-HCR
to add its voice to ours and address the following issues by
lobbying President Lahoud to redress the miscarriage of
justice and wholesale Human Rights abuses committed against
our fellow Christians by the newly departed Harewi Regime:
·
The release of Dr. Samir Geagea from prison.
·
Reverse the Presidential Decree that banned the
Lebanese Forces Party from participating in the political
process
·
Allow all exiles to return to Lebanon without fear of
retribution (Lebanese Forces officials and other Christians).
·
Reduce the involvement of the Military Courts,
especially in judicial cases that should legally be dealt with
by the Civilian Courts (as per International Law) and induct a
new and independent judiciary.
Finally, on this 50th
Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights we
hope that Lebanon, will embark upon a new dawn of reforms that
will see Lebanon and all of its people including Dr. Geagea
and fellow Lebanese Forces members and supporters bask in the
sunshine of the Human Rights Declaration, a document which in
fact was co-authored by one of Lebanon’s most respected sons,
Dr. Charles Malek fifty years to this day. Only in this way
can Lebanon regain its good name and image and the respect of
the International Community including the expatriate Lebanese
Community present in many countries around the globe.
This document is supported
by reports from Human Rights organisations, church leaders and
prominent politicians, press reports and other miscellaneous
sources (see below) that outline the Human Rights Abuses and
miscarriages of justice perpetrated against the Christians in
general and the Lebanese Forces Party and its leader Dr. Samir
Geagea in particular during the rule of the regime of
President Elias Harewi:
Amnesty International:
1.
Death in custody / Fear of torture: Fawzi Al-Rasi,
Hanna Atiq and Fu’ad Malek and about 17 others, 26 April 1994.
2.
LEBANON: “LEBANESE FORCES” TRIAL SERIUOSLY FLAWED, 24
June 1995.
3.
Fear of torture: Members of opposition groups – dozens
of people arrested from 18 to 21 December 1996, 23 December
1996.
4.
Country Report: Lebanon, Antoinette Chahin: Torture and
Unfair Trial, 5,8,1997.
5.
Country Report: LEBANON, HUMAN RIGHTS DEVELOPMENTS AND
VIOLATIONS, October 1997.
6.
Fear of Torture: K. Eid, G. T. Al Hilu, N. N. Daw, F.
H. Rahmah, B. A. Harb, W. A. Al-Khuri, N. J. Khatir, T. T.
Rahmah, G. S. Al-Birqashi, E. A. Rahmah, C. H. Yarid, 7 July
1998.
United Nations Human
Reports Committee:
1.
Press Release HR/CT/491, 7April 1997.
2.
Press Release HR/CT/492, 7April 1997.
US Department of
State:
1. Lebanon Country Report on Human Rights Practices for
1992.
2.
Lebanon Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1993
3.
Lebanon Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1994
4.
Lebanon Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1995
5.
Lebanon Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1996
6.
Lebanon Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1997
HUMANS RIGHTS
WATCH/Middle East:
"Ban on news
bulletins, political programs, commentaries in Lebanon”, March
24 1994.
Congress of the
United States:
"Expression
of concern regarding freedom of expression and political
pluralism in Lebanon.”
Member of Congress, William J. Coyne, April 1, 1994.
United States
Senate:
1.
“Expression of concern over restriction of political
news broadcasts and disbanding of the Lebanese Forces
Political Party by Lebanese government”. US Senator Hank
Brown, April 12, 1994.
2.“Expression of concern
regarding recent Human Rights developments in Lebanon
including disbanding of opposition Lebanese Forces Party and
prohibition of broadcasting of news bulletins, political
programs and commentaries”. US Senator Edward M. Kennedy, May
5, 1994.
The
Lebanese Center for policy studies The Lebanon Report Number 3
Fall 1996:
The
Unhappy Christians: The paradox of Samir Geagea.
Reuters, Beirut:
“Warlord gets third life term”, 5/9/97.
CWN,
Beirut:
“Lawyers for jailed Lebanese militia leader send urgent appeal
to Pope John Paul, asking him to intercede on behalf of their
client who they say is being persecuted”, May 8, 1997.
Nouveaux Droits de l’Homme – International – Mission du Liban:
The
State Of Human Rights In Lebanon, An Overview, April 7, 1997.
Cedar
Watch:
1.
Report on the Trial of Dr Samir Geagea and Co-accused Before
the Judicial Council of the Republic of Lebanon, Dany Chamoun
Assassination Case, 23/6/95 (Author Barrister Stephen
Stanton).
2.
Report and analysis concerning the trial and verdict of Samir
Geagea and the co-accused in the case of the bombing of the
Church of Sayyidat Al Najjat (Our Lady Of Deliverance), Zouk
Mikayel No. 3 of 1994 (Author Barrister Stephen Stanton), 20
November 1996.
Catholic Church Reports and Commentaries on the Issue of Human
Rights in Lebanon:
1. Patriarch Sfeir on the matter
of Human Rights abuses:
In response to a question by As-safir,
Beirut 7.9.98 on national reconciliation said: When we
address the matter of National Reconciliation, all Lebanese
should be included in this process of reconciliation without
the exclusion of any group. Presently, many groups remain
excluded from this reconciliation process.
Question:
Can you list these groups?
Patriarch Sfeir:
They are known.. Those whose are outside Lebanon and their
numbers are sufficient, and there are those isolated within
their own homes and are persecuted and prevented from speaking
out or are not allowed to speak, and those present in prison.
We all know who.
Question:
The Lebanese Forces, however, participated in the local
government
elections and were victorious in
Beirut?
Patriarch Sfeir:
Ok, fine.. however, what was the price and outcome of this
participation? But we do not wish to open this door.
Also Patriarch Sfeir said:
The Government must include everyone, and everyone must
participate in the political process and be effective in their
participation. This, however, is not the case. If you want
take the L.F. as an example. What was the result or outcome of
their participation and subsequent victories in the local
government did they not pay a heavy price?
Question:
You are tying between the local government results and the
sabotage network?
Patriarch Sfeir:
They were both linked to each other…
Question:
However, the investigations in this matter did not refer to
the L.F. but to members of the L.F.?
Patriarch Sfeir:
Publicly, they refer to the sabotage network, however, in
reality the Lebanese Forces as an organization are being
targeted. Why hide behind our fingers. Are they not being
victimized daily? Every day they seize a group of these people
for interrogation and torture and beat the living daylights
out of them and force them to sign statements that prevent
them from participating in any political activity. Is this an
acceptable situation?
2.
Message of the Synod of Bishops for Lebanon, Vatican 14.12 95
Respect for Human Rights,
Paragraph 52.
The return of peace, this is also
a return to the strict respect for Human Rights. Thus, we ask
instantly that the State put an end to all arbitrary arrest,
that torture be abolished, that those imprisoned for political
reasons be freed, that it clarify the fate of people who have
disappeared, that those driven from Lebanon without judicial
sentence be enabled to return home and live there safely, that
equality of all before the Law and before Justice be
re-established. The absence of respect for Human Rights
unjustly makes many Lebanese leave the country.
3. The Maronite Bishops statement,
Bkerki 6 March 1998.
2. A Comprehensive
Overview
The Patriarch Sfeir’s Christmas
message, 24 December 1997: “…the noted tendency to restrict
liberties; the inhibition of using the media except to the
fortunate and supporters (of the regime); the inequitable
treatment of those who are not favored and taking them to
court while the supporters are given seats in the government.
4. The Social Affairs:
The Church’s educational, health
and welfare institutions deliver unbiased and
non-discriminatory unique services to anyone. But these
institutions which embrace the poor, the needy, the destitute
and the persecuted have been suffering from great difficulties
(bias and discrimination) in their dealings with State. It is
feared that such difficulties and the State’s hostility
towards these institutions and the restrictions it imposes on
them may lead to deepen the rift between the citizens and the
State, and to the termination of the irreplaceable role these
institutions play in the above mentioned fields. Also, we
should not disregard the role that these institutions play.
All these issues will reflect on the right, on the dignity and
on the safety of the citizens.
4.D. The Administrative Issue
4. Public Service positions are
being given exclusively to one part of the Lebanese community
while Christians in general and Maronites specifically are
being excluded. This practice contravenes the principles of
co-existence and creates a feeling of persecution among
Christians.
5. The non-separation of the
Judiciary from the political authority and the non-affirmation
of the independence of the Judiciary. (and the use of the
Judiciary to affect political revenge as in the case of Dr.
Samir Geagea)
5. The Political Matter:
C. 1. Christians demand to have
the rights to elect their representatives and to hold them
accountable in the proper democratic matters.
C. 2 Christians are asking in
disquiet:
c. On the internal level,
Christians ask with concern about the reason behind the
nationalization of Muslim families in Christian villages while
the displaced of the Christians can not go back to their
original villages in other areas?
Also, why Christian leaders are
being persecuted and why the Lebanese Forces Party has been
disbanded and its leader (Dr. Samir Geagea) arrested despite
the fact that the Judiciary has found the Party and its leader
innocent from bombing the Sayidat Al Najjat Church? (the
pretext used to disband the Party) And why war file’s are
confined to the Lebanese Forces party and it’s leader and not
extended to others, especially to the loyalists? And why
criminals are being released and protected? And why the State
has being ignoring the crippled Jezzine area? And why
Christians are being harassed in the Frontier Zone?…
d. And in regard to the freedom of
the electronic media, why has this freedom been curtailed
subject and led to political censorship?
4. The Apostolic
Exhortation, Pope John Paul II, Beirut 10 May 1997
Paragraph 116: “I appeal to the
authorities and all Lebanese citizens to strive with all of
their capabilities to ensure that human rights are fully
respected…and that these rights are respected especially in
the area of dispensing justice and in the area of legal rights
guaranteed to those accused and imprisoned…no one must be
subjected to intimidation, be they as individuals or from
groups or from social authorities, nor must they be harassed
or cut off from social life because of their opinion, nor must
they be prevented from carrying out their spiritual customs or
form of worship … guaranteeing Human Rights is vitally
important because this matter is essential for the future of
the nation in fact the future of all humanity”.
|