I - THE CURRENT SITUATION OF THE LEBANESE FORCES.
It is proposed to examine and summarize the
various stages of human rights abuses and violations resulting in
political oppression in Lebanon. Such emasculation and oppression
was essentially conducted against the Lebanese Forces in an
attempt to exert greater control over the population in general
and the Christian opposition in particular.
Prologue
At the beginning of the war in Lebanon, The
Lebanese government, failing to assume its role and protect its
own citizens, obliged all the communities within Lebanon to resort
to military and social self-organization in order to ensure their
survival.
The Lebanese Forces were born.
Years passed, and responsibilities that were entrusted to the
Lebanese Forces increased and changed constantly. The Lebanese
Forces assumed the duty of defending the independence and the
sovereignty of Lebanon and supporting its legal institutions. They
worked to safeguard the security and freedom of the Christians and
developed into a popular resistance movement, a professional army,
a political party and a multitude of institutions dealing with the
various aspects of daily life and providing vital services in the
domains of health, education, housing and transport. In essence it
dealt with services supporting and assisting the community.
In 1989, the Lebanese Forces took part in the political process
of dialogue that aimed to achieve a peaceful outcome to the
Lebanese crisis.
It is in this context that the Lebanese Forces decided to
dissolve its armed branch, to demilitarize and to dedicate itself
to the political process. By these actions the Lebanese Forces
transformed itself into a political party.
THE ROAD TO CALVARY
The document of National Reconciliation signed at Taef in 1989
was supported by regional and international powers. It marked a
new beginning in the history of Lebanon, an era of national
understanding and dialogue between Lebanese; a new life experience
built on a renewed basis and foundation. It meant the dissolution
of all militias (Lebanese and foreign); the formation of a
government of reconciliation and national entente; proclamation of
a general amnesty; the holding of democratic elections as well as
ministerial, administrative, judicial and other reforms. The
philosophy at the core of this compromise comprised an equation
made up of two elements:
Political reforms: to redefine the institutional balance by
largely reducing the prerogatives of the president of the
republic, while assigning the executive power to the Council of
ministers. Increased powers were to be given to the House of
Deputies, especially to the Speaker (These were meant to be
Christian compromises).
Withdrawal of all foreign armed forces (this was meant to be a
Muslim compromise).
But in practice it is Syria who is the military and political
watchdog of this process. The application of the agreement was
selective and built largely around the interests of Syria and its
allies who regarded themselves as the winners while they imposed
on the Christians the status of losers. On the military level,
Syria has 35 000 regular soldiers? in Lebanon not counting the
intelligence personnel. Politically, the Syrian President Hafez
Assad initially assigned the Lebanese file to his deputy, Mr.
Abdelhalim Khaddam who arbitrated and managed even the most basic
detail within the Lebanese ruling system; Today his son, Mr.
Bachar El Assad is in charge of the portfolio. To “legitimize”
this “hegemony”, the Treaty of Fraternity, Cooperation and
Coordination was signed between Lebanon and Syria on May 22,1994,
an arrangement which marked the submission of the former to the
latter. As a result, reconciliation and national accord never were
fulfilled. Numerous reasons can be presented, among them:
The Lebanese Forces disarmed voluntarily while other militias
such as the Palestinians, the PKK and Hezbollah remain armed.
Other Moslem and pro--Syrian militias proceeded to hide their
arms with the complicity - passive or active - of the authorities.
Meanwhile foreign armies and groups did not withdraw or
re-deploy as agreed; The withdrawal of the Syrian army into the
Bekaa valley within two years of signing the Accord did not
materialize, on the contrary, the Syrian army extended its
presence to new regions and to the heartland of the Christian
community.
The application of the general amnesty law was selective and
biased in order to find a pretext to weaken the Christian
opposition, especially the Lebanese Forces. The Judiciary was used
as an instrument of revenge and the LF were made to appear as the
only cause and instrument of all the atrocities of the war in
Lebanon.
Furthermore, it is significant to note the government’s
naturalization decree by which it awarded Lebanese nationality to
350.000 foreigners, mainly Muslim Syrians. Noting that the
Lebanese population does not exceed 3,500,000 inhabitants and that
the country was convalescing from the civil war, and considering
that in Lebanon power rests on a very delicate demographic and
confessional balance, such a Decree had vast implications for the
country. Indeed, voting trends of these “ New Lebanese” played
a decisive role in electing pro-government candidates in the
legislative elections in 1992 and 1996, boycotted by the
Christians.
Moreover, the authorities still refuse to recognize the civic
rights of Lebanese expatriates (who are mostly Christians).
In the same way, 27.000 Palestinians and 12.000 nomads
benefited from the government’s “generosity” in the domain
of naturalization.
Whilst the majority of the displaced Christians have not been
allowed to return to their homes, illegal occupants of properties
benefit from the unending generosity of the State’s Treasury,
under the pretext of facilitating the eviction of occupied
properties.
The regime did not spare anyone in its drive against the
Lebanese Forces. Media, civil sector institutions, health,
educational centers and other services were targeted. The
government applied political, financial and other pressures in its
aim to shut these institutions or to control them. The Following
are a few examples:
Saint Anthony School: School Principal, Mrs. Izys Daher was
forced to resign.
LBC TV: 29 people were abused and intimidated without any
apparent reason other than their support for the Lebanese Forces.
Their colleagues at Radio Free Lebanon and the weekly AL-Massira
were given a list of political subjects that should not be
discussed or raised at their media outlets.
SLIAS Press, Medical Services Mutual Insurance, were closed and
then re-opened under strict control
Auxilia President Dr Elie Choueifati was arrested several times
and interrogated regarding the association activities and his
contacts with other local and foreign associations. He was also
questioned about sources of finance and about beneficiary
families.
Several permanent and local associations were forcibly closed.
Two of their personnel, Roula Tawil and Said Akhras, were
interrogated.
THE STUDENT ORGANIZATION:
The head of this organization, Salman Samaha, was asked several
times to supply interrogators with information regarding the
structure and activities of this academic body. They ordered him
to stop all activities. Several members of the organization were
either arrested or interrogated, including Clovis Choueifati,
Antoine Saad, Pascal Haddad, Antoine Abi Najm and Elias Asmar.
DEFENSE LAWYERS:
Several lawyers close to the Lebanese Forces were interrogated
including Hanna Habchi, Rita Mallat, Jean Chidiac and Abboud Bayeh.
Others were subjected to indirect pressures whilst their careers
were threatened (offices, clients, files). The right to rally and
demonstrate is not recognized by the authorities. A government
decree has outlawed such right but in practice, it is still
enforced upon the Christian opposition.
Large numbers of the opposition who were amongst the huge
crowds welcoming Pope John Paul II were detained and tortured for
daring to use the opportunity of the Pope’s historic visit to
Lebanon and express before him the lack for justice, freedom and
democracy.
Every incident is a “good pretext” for the Regime to
initiate with mass arrests of Christians. For example, the vast
campaign that followed the attack on a Syrian mini bus at Tabarja
on 18 December 1996: Dozens of youth from various factions of the
Christian opposition were arrested and tortured, including the
following from the Lebanese Forces: Michel Taouk, Mansour Taouk,
Charbel Mattar, Elie Keyrouz, Fadi El-Chamati, Riad Semaan,
Charbel Abi Akl, Michel Keyrouz, Antoine Abou Jaoude, Fouad Abou
Mosleh, Elie Hadchiti, Sami Rahme, Antoine Bared, Pierre Dagher,
Charbel Nakad, Roland Taouk, Atef Eid, Joseph Khater, Pierre El-Kozah,
Jean Akouri, Pier Jabbour, Nader Nader, Georges El Alam, Rony
Haddad, Aghnatios El Alam, Nabil Abou Nasr, Georges Rahme, Walid
Sleimane, Georges Taouk, Tony Rahme, Jean Khoury, Charbel Boulos,
Francois Abi Tayeh and Georges Fayad...
The Maronite Patriarch, Cardinal Sfeir expressed his
indignation at what he described as “Night Visitors”. He
denounced these pursuits and said that “ such acts give the
Lebanese the impression that they are not welcome in their own
country...and at a time where human rights are respected in many
countries, our society remains divided with a winner and a loser,
and with an oppressed and an oppressor”.
Even Mrs. Sethrida Geagea, the wife of Dr Samir Geagea, was not
spared. Her house is under constant surveillance and the access to
it is blocked by a checkpoint that intentionally intimidates
visitors and asks them to reveal their identities leaving them
vulnerable to future interrogation, persecution and torture.
THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE LEBANESE FORCES
In 1992, the regime’s campaign against the Lebanese Forces
accelerated. The persecution of the Lebanese Forces became more?
aggressive and systematic. The targeting became concerted. The
Lebanese Forces were leading the opposition. Dr. Samir Geagea
refused to take part in a totally unbalanced, corrupt and
unpatriotic government. His refusal of a ministerial portfolio was
a sign of his disapproval of the regime’s complete retreat from
implementing the principles of national reconciliation and
Democratic process.
Dr. Samir Geagea continued, from his position and despite the
enormous threats and pressures against him - to reiterate the
spirit of the Agreement and ask that those principles be applied
in all domains, especially in regard to sovereignty, national
equilibrium, political rights and individual freedoms....
In his drive to transform the Lebanese Forces into a political
party, Dr Geagea devised a new method built on four main
strategies:
- The creation of the “Academic Institute for Political
Sciences” aiming to provide future leaders of the Party with
adequate experience in the areas of politics, history, sociology,
human rights and public relations.
- The institution of experts committees assigned to review and
examine the political Manifesto of the Lebanese Forces.
- The elaboration of pertinent regulations and restructuring
programs to enable the Lebanese Forces transition into political
activity.
-The establishment of local structures (regions, districts, and
cells) in order to increase efficiency, cohesiveness and
communication.
Such a political organization created a swift reaction from the
Regime in Lebanon.
To terrorize and subjugate the Lebanese Forces, the regime and
its allies sent messages written in blood:
Four Lebanese Forces officials were murdered: they were Elie
Daou (Kfarchima), Sami Abou Jaoude (Jal El Dib), Nadim Abdennour
(Achrafieh) and Sleiman Akiki (Kfardhebian).
In September 1992, Boutros Khawand, was kidnapped from his home
in broad daylight at Sin El Fil and his fate remains unknown until
today. The disappearance of Khawand has been reported by several
international human rights organizations. Human Rights Watch wrote
the following: “Khawand disappeared on September 15, 1992 when
he was 500 meters away from his home at Sin El Fil and in an area
controlled by the Syrian army...Mr. Khawand’s car was
intercepted by an armed group of 24 men dressed in civilian
clothes but wearing military boots; the group arrived in three
cars including a BMW and a red colored mini bus”.
Amnesty International reported in January 1999 that a former
Lebanese detainee told Khawand’s family of his presence in the
Syrian prison of Adra.
From 1992 until 1994, many Lebanese Forces members and
supporters were subjected to violent assaults, harassment and
repetitive detention.
To increase the pressure, Gunshots and explosive projectiles
were fired at LF meetings followed by massive arrests (illegal and
unjustified) carried out by the Regime; an example: the mass
arrest of forty students at Achrafieh.
On 25 July 1992, the army surrounded and encircled the
Headquarters of the Lebanese Forces at Al karantina. This maneuver
was contrary to the provisions of the Taef Agreement, which
guaranteed the security of the LF Headquarters. The following day
Dr. Geagea and all LF personnel were forced to leave and establish
their political head office at Ghadras outside Beirut
THE ASSAULT ON THE CHURCH
On February 27, 1994 during the celebration of Mass at Our Lady
of Deliverance Church at Zouk Mikhael an explosion went off. Ten
people were killed and several others were injured. The great
shock plunged the Christians of Lebanon into absolute disarray.
The following day, Dr. Geagea held a press conference where he
voiced his utter disgust for ignoring the rights of citizens to
security despite 90,000 Lebanese security personnel and asked the
authorities to shoulder their responsibilities and duties.
From then on, an immediate campaign was orchestrated by the
Regime in an attempt to attribute this horrible crime to the
Lebanese Forces.
On March 10, the army surrounded the new Headquarters of the
Lebanese Forces and barred access to journalists and visitors
(individuals and groups).
On March 23, the cabinet met in an “emergency session” and
decreed the following:
Dissolve the Lebanese Forces Party and dispossess it from all
its assets (which were immediately seized and confiscated by the
army).
Ban all political programs and news bulletins on all private
Audio-Visual Media.
Clearly all these decisions had no legal or judicial basis, and
it was evident that the Lebanese Authorities short-circuited all
avenues of legal procedures (investigation, interrogation,
judgment and decision).
Some hours later, Fouad Malek, ex-chief of Staff and president
of the executive committee of the party was arrested and detained
at The Ministry of Defense. It is within this notorious place of
Torture that thousands of Lebanese Forces members were illegally
held in the last few years. In one small cell in the 3rd
basement level, and without access to sunlight or fresh air, Dr.
Geagea has been detained in solitary confinement since 21 April
1994.
After the so called “trial” of the Church bombing and the
day after Dr. Geagea was cleared of direct participation in the
massacre (apparently due to “doubt” but in reality because the
main witness retracted all his statements stating repeatedly that
they were extracted under torture and duress), the editor of
L’Orient Le Jour (a local French language newspaper) wrote:
“Since the beginning, public opinion could not be deceived
and perceived the church explosion as a shameless act for
political purposes but people were powerless in the face of this
grinding machine. In such a Republic- the product of fifteen years
of fratricidal war, misfortunes, sufferings and sacrifices coupled
with great expectations for Lebanon, Dr. Geagea became a
“nuisance” and never resigned himself to remain quiet. He was
perceived as a menace within a subjugated and homogenized
political class that united in its obedience. Had he accepted the
ministry portfolio, the situation would have been very different.
More scandalous and significant, was the offer by a top official
who approached Dr. Geagea and his family with a proposal that he
should leave the country as the trap was closing around him”.
The following chapters will highlight the different methods and
scenarios used by the Regime in order to effect political revenge.
Please note the following background:
The assault on the Zouk Mikhael church was aimed at forcing
Pope John Paul II to abort his planned visit to Lebanon in 1994;
this succeeded into postponing the visit for three years.
The basement at the ministry of Defense had never been
established as an official or legal detention center. Faced with
this flagrant miscarriage of Justice, the Minister of Defense took
a decision and “legalized” the ministry’s prison several
months after Dr. Geagea and LF members were tortured and
imprisoned there.
Dr. Geagea refused many offers and “advice” by Government
officials to leave the country “as long as the opportunity is
available to him ”.
These top officials included the Deputy Prime Minister and
Minister of the Interior Mr. Michael Murr, And also Mr. Elias
Herawi, president of the Republic. Responding to a journalist he
said: “What do you want me to do...he is refusing to leave and
he also refused all ministerial positions that were offered to
him… I cannot do anything for him anymore”.
“When even one victim cannot get justice, each one must
expect to be the first to be subjected to these outrages”. (Demosthene)