1) HR Conference April 99
Human Rights Abuses In
Lebanon Why should You bother?
Dr. Rachid Rahme
Slide
2) Lebanon a living
laboratory of Pluralism & Multicultural Society
? Not only a question of
Morality versus Political and Economic Interests
? But each modern Society
carries a Lebanon within it.
? "More than a country: a
mission" (Pope John Paul the Second)
? Hence Lebanon is both a
matter of Morality and Interests
Please allow me first to
start by asking why should you really bother about Lebanon and
its Human Right record?
Lebanon consists of a living
laboratory in which two large communities of different
religious background and in more or less equal numbers are
sharing the same country. These 2 communities are in turn
divided into 17 different Confessions.
Please note that whilst I
will be dealing essentially with the rights of the Christian
Community in Lebanon, I am absolutely not implying any form of
conflicting or adversarial insinuation against any other
community in Lebanon.
Moving away from purely
academic and philosophical arguments, let me state that
Lebanon should not be considered only as a question of
Political Morality on one side, versus Political and Economic
Interests on the other. It has a much wider scope, because
each modern society in our times carries some sort of Lebanon
within it. The experience in Lebanon’s Laboratory is unique as
a result of the backgrounds and balanced numbers, hence Pope
John Paul the Second considers it "more than a country: a
mission" and is eager for this experience to succeed.
Therefore Lebanon should be considered also as a matter of
Political Interest for all countries with pluralistic and
multicultural components.
Slide
3) Pluralism: Rights of
Communities & Rights of Individuals
? Democracy in the Middle
East?
? Pluralism versus
fundamentalism
? Freedom: Words versus Deeds
? Human Rights in Lebanon:
Progression versus Regression
Having laid the ground let me
quickly address a very important issue: Whilst some interest
exist in monitoring Human Right Abuse at the level of the
Individual, less attention is brought to bear on monitoring
the Human Rights of Communities. Is it really true that the
Human Right of communities consist of the summation of the
Human Right of its individuals? I do not think so because with
Communities we have to consider Specificities of the group as
well as Political, Historical, Sociological, Geo-Demographic
and other factors. The Abuse Of Human Rights of Communities is
Cumulative with vast and exponential effects. (Kosovo)
Therefore it is even more
important to safeguard Democracy and Freedom within a
Pluralistic society. But can Democracy be achieved in the
Middle East? Here again we have an important moral issue of
worldwide interest: without Democracy, radicalization and
fundamentalism would ravage the oppressed communities and here
time is our enemy. This urgent issue should be addressed
effectively for also in the Middle East there exists a strange
divorce between words and deeds and between the realities and
the speeches. The antithesis of fundamentalism resides in
Democratic Pluralism.
It is here of importance to
observe that within its environment, Lebanon was somehow
advanced in the Democratic Process with flourishing essential
freedoms. But alas, instead of progressing along that path, we
are witnessing a crushing and devastating decline in Democracy
and essential freedoms especially after Lebanon became
subjected to tight Syrian Dictate.
Slide
4) Essential Background
? Since the Agreement on
National reconciliation (Taef 1990): a deliberate Policy on
Corrupting and modifying its text and spirit in accordance
with the Change in the balance of Power on 3 levels:
? International
? Regional
? Internal
Since the Agreement on
National reconciliation (Taef 1990): There was a deliberate
Policy on Corrupting and modifying its text and spirit in
accordance with the Change in the balance of Power. This
occurred on 3 levels:
1- International: The US, who
is the master player in the ME, was quite eager to push The
Important Peace Process that started in Madrid. This priority
did not stop at small details on low priority issues within
Lebanon.
2- Regional: There was a
total fragmentation of the Regional guarantors of the Taef
Agreement: The collapse of the Arab Tripartite Committee, the
change in priorities… especially when Syria was allowed to
exert its Political and military hegemony over Lebanon, as a
direct result of The 2nd Gulf War and the alliance of "Desert
Storm" where Syrian participation was much needed.
3- Internal: the weakening of
the Political Dynamism of the Christians in Lebanon which in
itself guarantees the Internal Lebanese Balance.
Let us now look over the past
9 years and observe the realities of Lebanese Coexistence We
have six facets of Abuse :
Slid Slide
5) 9 years later,
Observations on the realities of Lebanese Coexistence
? Six Facets of Abuse
? Failure in the return of
Refugees to their homes
? Illegal Naturalization
? Marginalization of the
Lebanese in the Diaspora
? Consolidation of flawed
Election Laws
? The Continuing lack of
National Reconciliation
? Consolidation of the
persecution of Christian Active Parties and Groups
1- Failure in the
re-institution of Refugees: This is a continuing huge Human
Tragedy now in its ninth year. Although all the Lebanese
Communities share the suffering, the Refugee problem displays
special social and political sequelae amongst the Christian
Refugees of Lebanon. The Deracination and failure in the full
return (Social and Political) of Christians occurred not only
in the Casas of Baabda, Aley, Shouf, but also in areas of the
Bekaa and the North. This led to the destruction of the
Geo-Social Continuity of the Christian Community within the
Lebanon, and contributed in enhancing "the Minority Complex"
amongst the Christians leading to feelings of estrangement
within their country. This process was translated by the
quasi-total abstention from participating in public life and
the ever-increasing trend amongst Christian intellectuals to
Emigrate away from Lebanon.
2- Illegal Naturalization:
The Government issued the "Naturalization Decree" only few
weeks after the Bombing of The Church in Zouk. The Dust of the
massacre could not hide the following facts:
The real number of newly
naturalized Lebanese remains officially unknown. Remembering
that the total population of Lebanon is around 3,500,000 and
that the Confessional distribution within the Lebanon is more
or less equal, Credible independent reports speak of the
Government naturalizing more than 350,000 with a vast majority
from Syria. The proportions are 80% Moslems and 20%
Christians. The reports also speak of the naturalization of
27,000 Palestinians and 12,000 nomads…These newly naturalized
"Lebanese" played a pivotal role in the 1996 Lebanese general
"elections" backing en masse and by the busload the
Government-supported lists of Deputies.
At the same time the Government refuses to recognize the
Political and Civil Rights of permanently settled Lebanese
Emigrants (because of their well known Christian majority).
Please note another form of Vast Demographic pressure caused
by the huge numbers of Syrian workers that reside in Lebanon
(in 1997 the number was 2,331,634 Syrian nationals).
3. Marginalization of
Lebanese temporarily residing abroad, preventing them from
participating in the political process. Let me give two quick
examples:
There is great difficulty in
registering the descendants of the already- registered
Lebanese living temporarily abroad…
The Lebanese in the Diaspora
(Christian majority) are not allowed to vote in their
embassies…(Whilst the Syrians enjoy this right).
4. Consolidation of flawed
Election Laws: From a grand total of 128 Member of Parliament:
Non-Christians practically
elect 49 Christian MPs and all but one non-Christian MPs.
Christians practically elect
15 Christian MPs and only one non-Christian MP (The total N؛
of MPs in the Casas of Northern Matn, Keserwan and Byblos).
5. The Continuing lack of
National Reconciliation and hence the lack in the legitimacy
of the Lebanese Regime. Please note the continuing decline of
Christian representativity within the Lebanese Executive Since
the Taef agreement...
6. Consolidation of the
persecution of Christian Active Parties and Groups using all
methods available. The vacuum created was filled with a new
docile class of "Christian representatives". Let me give you a
few pointers:
It has been 5 years now that
Dr. Geagea is illegally detained in Solitary confinement and
the Lebanese Forces Party illegally disbanded by decree. The
case presented to the Lebanese Courts against the Government,
remains unanswered until today (5 years now).
Now in its 8th year, General
Aoun’s illegal exile (originally planned for 5 years)
continues. The Regime is consolidating this abnormality...
Now 6 years after his last
trip to the Lebanon, former president Amine Gemayel remains
fearful for his life and security should he return. His
requests for normalization of his situation remain unanswered
despite all the praises Mr. Gemayel bestowed on the present
Regime…
Through continuing Syrian and
Lebanese Intelligence interference, all Christian Lebanese
Parties were fragmented and paralysed.
Opposition movements and
groups were systematically persecuted and crushed. The LF, the
Students and Union Groups, General Aoun’s supporters
etc…continue to suffer regular persecution and oppression.
When some "opposition" groups
tried to jump onto the wagon of the regime, they were rebuffed
and rebuked suggesting that their new moves were neither
needed nor appreciated!
Let us now look over the past
9 years and observe the realities of Lebanese Sovereignty:
Slide
6) 9 years later,
Observations on the realities of Lebanese Sovereignty
? Absence of Syrian
withdrawal from Lebanon according to the Taef Agreement (due
before September 1992).
? Absence of Israeli
withdrawal from South Lebanon
? A long list of unbalanced
bilateral Treaties & Agreements between Syria & Lebanon
? Despite the inherent
differences, imposed interconnectivity between the liberation
of South Lebanon and the Syrian Golan Heights.
Absence of Syrian withdrawal
from Lebanon According to the Taef Agreement (due before
September 1992). Syrian redeployment out of Beirut and Mount
Lebanon, and eventual total withdrawal from the Bekaa and the
North, was essentially guaranteed by all the International and
Regional sponsors of the Taef Agreement and is evident in all
the texts and declarations…This guaranteed promise of
withdrawal was obtained as a precondition by the Christian MPs
in Taef before they were ready to consider discussing any
Constitutional Reform.
Not only the withdrawals did
not take place but instead an increase in the number and
deployment of the Syrian troops took place in the Christian
areas. President Assad declared in August 1998 (6 years after
the due date) that the withdrawal of Syrian troops is "open to
the request of the Lebanese Regime"! The Lebanese Regime is a
satellite of Syrian influence and the Lebanese Army and
security personnel now boost a number of around 75,000 used
essentially internally to control and oppress the opposition.
Absence of Israeli withdrawal
from South Lebanon leading to an ongoing tragedy of suffering,
deracination and death.
A long list of unbalanced
bilateral Treaties & Agreements between Syria & Lebanon. Let
me give you two quick examples:
1. According to the latest
published official census, the number of Syrian Nationals that
entered and remained in Lebanon until the end of September
1997 is 2,331,634.
2. The 1997 Economic Deficit
of Lebanon is around 300 Million US$ (444,724 Million Leb.
Lira) in favour of Syria…
Despite the inherent
differences, imposed interconnectivity between the liberation
of South Lebanon and the Syrian Golan Heights. These
differences are important:
The following paragraph was
omitted
1-Historical: Israel entered
Lebanon in stages especially in 1978 and in 1982 as a direct
result of a purely Palestinian-Israeli war, whilst the Syrian
Golan Heights were occupied in 1967 as a result of a declared
and direct Syrian-Israeli war.
2-Legal :On the Lebanese
side, The UN resolutions 425,426 & 520 call for an unequivocal
and total withdrawal from all Lebanese territories, a fact
accepted in principle by all concerned parties (differences
exist in the modalities); On the Syrian side, The Golan falls
under the UN resolutions 242 & 338 with the legal qui-pro-quo
(pertaining to the difference in the French and English
translations of 242), as well as the lack of unanimity in
accepting the principles of the resolutions.
3-Practical: On the Lebanese
side, a declared willingness from Israel to withdraw from all
Lebanese territories according to certain security
arrangements; whilst on the Syrian side the Golan falls under
strict Israeli laws making it an integral part of Israel.
Furthermore, whilst some discussions in Israel are presently
taking place on how best to withdraw from South Lebanon; new
laws, a two third majority in the Knesset and other
deliberations are materialising to consolidate Israeli
annexation of the Golan Heights making any change subject to
an Israeli public referendum.
4-Pragmatic: In the Golan,
Peace reigns on both sides of the Green line with the Syrian
Regime assuming the responsibility of preserving the Peace,
whilst the South Lebanon is continuously burning with the
flames of war…
To summarise let us look How
we got here:
7) How Did We Get Here?
Having established the facts
on the ground, It becomes obvious that :
Slide
8) Dr. Samir Geagea: the
symbol of a Community under persecution
? The Policy of positive
non-participation: Refusing to take part in two governments,
Voicing Public Objection on unfair & unpopular Decisions,
Refusing to take part and leading an organized political
campaign to boycott the 1992 general Elections. Actively
working for peace and reconciliation by disbanding the
Christian militia.
The Policy of positive
non-participation: Since the first signs of the premeditated
corruption of the execution of the Taef Agreement, Dr. Geagea
opted for a Policy of non-participation by:
1. Refusing to become a
Minister in the two Governments of Omar Karame and Rachid Solh.
2. Voicing his Public
Objection on unpopular & unfair Government decrees like the
flawed "General Amnesty" law, the unbalanced Bilateral
Treaties and Agreements with Syria, & the total absence of
National Reconciliation etc…
3. Refusing to take part and
leading an organized political campaign to boycott the 1992
general Elections. This showed Dr. Geagea as a systematic and
strong opponent confronting the predetermined political
dictate in its different forms.
Opening a new chapter and
actively working for peace and reconciliation by disbanding
the Christian militia. Please note that until today other
militias are swarming in Lebanon like the Hezbollah, Amal and
the Pro-Syrian Palestinians.
Dr. Geagea also undertook a
Policy of internal Organization and Political Mobilization.
Let me give you 3 examples:
Slide
9) Dr. Samir Geagea: the
symbol of a Community under persecution (2)
? The Policy of Internal
Organization and Political Mobilization The Lebanese Forces
Party The unification of the Opposition A Political Manifesto
opposed to the concepts of feudalism, regionalism and
political opportunism.
1.The LF Party: Faced with an
imposed Policy of Persecution, Marginalization and loss of the
Democratic Process, Dr. Geagea began a wide-ranging campaign
of Political Mobilization and internal institutional
Organization of the Lebanese Forces Party. This organization
was felt on different occasions…
2. The Unification of the
Opposition groups as was evident in the Campaign for the
boycott of the 1992 Elections and the Unification of all
Christian groups around the Maronite Patriarch in Bkerke.
3. Dr Geagea worked to
develop a Political manifesto opposed to the concepts and
practices of feudalism, regionalism, aggressive
confessionalism and political opportunism, factors that he
considered as major causes of decline in the Lebanese
Political life. This created a popular trend around the LF
amongst the intellectuals…
Dr. Geagea is the symbol of a
community under persecution also in His Policy towards Syria:
Slide
10) Dr. Samir Geagea: the
symbol of a Community under persecution (3)
? The Policy towards Syria
1. Dr. Geagea does not
bargain on Lebanese Sovereignty
2. Dr. Geagea calls for
balanced and normal relations based on freedom and
independence. Then came the bombing of the Church…
The Policy towards Syria
1. Dr. Geagea does not
bargain on Lebanese Sovereignty: In Jan. 1992, Dr. Geagea
spoke of his "wish that the coming year would see the
restoration of Sovereignty for the Lebanon" (The Syrians were
supposed to withdraw by September 1992 at the latest). The
same message was carried to Washington and London during his
visits to the two countries in February 1992.
2. Dr. Geagea calls for
balanced and normal relations based on freedom and
independence. This caused increasing pressure to be exerted on
him in an attempt to change his position and accept the statu
quo but without any success.
Then came the bombing pf the
Church. Dr. Geagea was hurriedly and illegally incarcerated in
Solitary Confinement. What was the aftermath ?
Slide
11) Dr. Geagea in Solitary
Confinement. The Aftermath
? The muzzling of the private
Media and the attacks on the Freedom of expression (23rd of
March 1994).
? Attacks on fundamental and
essential Freedoms
? The illegal Naturalization
Decree
? The Flawed General Election
Laws
? The taming of all
political, Professional, Partisan and Student Unions through
persecution and terror.
On the 23rd of March 1994 and
immediately after the Church bombing, the Government issued a
decree muzzling all political broadcast from the private
Media. This continued for many months only to end up in the
"organization of The Media" with controlled permits and
Censorship that continues until today.
During the same time, the
Regime embarked on a series of attacks on fundamental and
essential individual freedoms. Please refer to the excellent
book available for details. The Judiciary was used as an
instrument of Revenge and injustice. The persecution of
opposition groups continues until today.
The illegal Naturalization
Decree was issued only a few weeks after Dr. Geagea’s
incarceration.
The Flawed General Election
Laws of 1996 (consolidating the 1992 irregularities)
The taming of all political,
Professional, Partisan and Student Unions through persecution
and terror.
After 9 years of persecution,
what is the position of the LF now. Let me show you some
pictures:
Slide
12) 9 years of persecution,
what next?
Despite all the persecutions,
The Lebanese Forces remain the strongest and most organized
Christian entity within Lebanon. The LF showed their presence
during:
? The Pope’s visit to Lebanon
? The Municipality Elections
with 85% success rate in the whole area of Christian
distribution
? The Student Elections in
Universities and Colleges
? The Professional Unions
Elections
? Sporting Events (The Hekme
Syndrome)
Finally let me conclude by
reiterating the following :
Slide
13) Recommendations (1)
? The Lebanese Problem
Concerns You
? The Human Right Abuse is
changing the fundamental Characteristics of the Pluralistic
Society In Lebanon.
? Dr. Samir Geagea, the
Political Prisoner is the symbol of a whole Community under
persecution
And utilizing all possible
means at your disposal, however big or small , and
Slide
14) Recommendations (2)
After 20 years of War and 9
years of Persecution we ask you to help us secure the bare
minimum of Human Rights and stop this terrible decline in the
fundamental freedoms in Lebanon. This process should start by
exerting all the necessary pressures to free Dr. Geagea and
all other political prisoners in Lebanon and work towards
ensuring the participation of the political opposition in
Lebanon’s political life. |