The Lebanon We Want To Build
TEXT OF THE DOCUMENT
ISSUED BY THE LEBANESE FRONT
ON THE 23rd OF DECEMBER 1980
AT DEIR AOUKAR
FOREWORD
Three issues
are decisively at stake today: the survival of the state of Lebanon as
a free, independent and sovereign state; the survival of the society
of Lebanon as a free, open and pluralist society; and the survival of
the Christian community of Lebanon a free and secure, enjoying
complete mastery over its own values and destiny. How to avert these
three dangers is precisely what is meant by the term "the Lebanese
Cause".
If the
political independence of Lebanon should be overwhelmed or undermined,
if its free society should be altered so as to conform to the pattern
of the other societies of the Middle East, and if its Christian
community should cease to be master of itself and its destiny, as it
has been in the past, a major transformation in the balance of forces
in the Middle East would result.
This fate is not inevitable; it can
still be warded off. The
first requirement towards that end is a full knowledge of the facts of
the case. So far as the will and the views of the Christian
community of Lebanon are concerned, the present document, which is
intended to be an historic one, can meet this requirement.
Lebanon cannot save itself by itself.
It needs help from outside. When have nations in great peril in modern
times saved themselves without the aid
of their friends? The destruction
of the free, open and genuinely pluralist society of Lebanon, and
the disappearance of the only remaining free Christian community in
the Middle East, while the rest of the world is merely looking on, are
not simple events: they are world events.
Not only moral, human and spiritual
values are at stake, but precisely because this is the case, other
factors of a material and concrete nature are involved. The mountains
of Lebanon are, physically speaking, the most strategically
impregnable part of the Middle East; whoever gets firmly entrenched in
them can significantly help in defending the Eastern Mediterranean.
Nor can the peoples of America and the West find more reliable and
lasting friends in the Middle East than the people of Lebanon.
Moreover, there are some who affect to seek in the Middle East and who
think they have found a substitute for the free and open
society of Lebanon so far as affording facilities for international
finance, commerce and communication and for free exchange of ideas is
concerned. Given the realities of the Middle East, there can never be
an adequate substitute for Lebanon. Again, it is not in the best
interests of Middle Eastern, and indeed world, stability for tire
peace loving Lebanese, who are passionately attached to their freedoms
and land, to get radicalized, There are enough disaffected and
embittered people around to add to them now tire Lebanese. And there
is absolutely, no need for that. Finally, care should be taken lest
the tide of world subversion engulf Lebanon and lest Lebanon become a
permanent base for international terrorism.
Consequently, the
arguments to be urged are not only
sentimental and moral, but of 'the most practical arid hardheaded
order. The truth imposes itself once it is known.
The Lebanese Front is composed of
Christian leaders who assumed, arid continue to assume, great
responsibilities in their life. Its forces withstood a formidable
onslaught of strangers and mercenaries upon Lebanon. The aim of this
assault has been to overrun arid subjugate Lebanon. But tire Lebanese
Front arid tile heroic Forces of Resistance associated with it
continue to control the larger part of Christian Lebanon. The Front,
therefore, can claim that it speaks in tire name of the Christians of
Lebanon.
The present document sets forth the
basic principles and objectives of tire Front. Many of the non
Christians would also openly subscribe to it if they were free to
express their opinion. But they are not free.
The document
sets in motion a fundamental debate among the Lebanese themselves.
Tile Christians have formulated their views with the utmost sense of,
responsibility. Let tire others now put forward theirs. A fruitful
dialogue should then ensue. One hopes that it will also provoke an
examination of conscience by tire governments and peoples oj' the
world, both East and West. No one responsibly concerned for the great
events unfolding in the Middle East today can afford now to ignore the
convictions of the Christians of Lebanon, as authoritatively expounded
in this document, about their freedoms arid the destiny and place of
their own country.
January 5, 1981
Charles
Malik
At this moment of decision in the
history of Lebanon and the Middle East, the Lebanese Front wishes to
make clear, before the people of Lebanon, before world public opinion,
and for history, its fundamental positions and objectives.
I
In the Name of Our Heritage, Our Values
and Our People
The
Lebanese Front is fully conscious that it speaks in the name of a
cumulative Lebanese heritage relatively uninterrupted for 6,000 years.
Although the continuity of this heritage has been somewhat checkered,
its discontinuity cannot be compared with other discontinuities in the
Middle East. There is no continuity in the Eastern Mediterranean
comparable to that of the Lebanese heritage.
The Lebanese Front is also fully
conscious of the value of this heritage at once to Lebanon, to the
Middle East and to the world. Only in the light of this value in which
the Front believes and to which it firmly clings can its fundamental
positions be understood. The Front is most anxious to preserve the
customs, values and freedoms of Lebanon's way of life, and to serve as
a bulwark against all perils besetting it today. Its faith in Lebanon
and its unique values, and its absolute determination to defend them,
explain all the positions of the Front. The Front is fully aware of
the fact that Lebanon is entrusted with a treasure than which nothing
is more precious or holy, and it refuses to permit any particle of
this trust to fritter away.
The Lebanese Front also knows that it speaks in
the name of an overwhelming majority of the people of Lebanon,
although it recognizes that part of this majority is not in a position
to express its opinion freely. Therefore the Lebanese Front is honored
by the feeling that it represents not only those who can express their
opinion freely, but also the others who do not at present enjoy this
freedom.
II
The Political Structure
The
Lebanon we want to build is what has been unique and constant about
Lebanon down the ages; a Lebanon that refuses to be absorbed by any
other entity or to be qualified by anything other than itself; a
state, therefore, independent, sovereign and free.
We oppose
any attempt at dissolving Lebanon in its environment or in something
other than itself, a dissolution that will cause its distinctive
characteristics to disappear.
The borders of the Lebanon we want to
build are its present borders as determined by its Constitution and as
internationally recognized.
The political system of the Lebanon we
want to build is republican, democratic, parliamentary, pluralist,
free and open, in the technical senses of these terms as universally
recognized.
While
preserving its total sovereignty and independence, Lebanon establishes
relations with other states on the basis of sovereign equality and
mutual respect.
The rule
governing these relations shall be the common interests, culturally,
economically and politically, between Lebanon and the other states, be
they Arab, Middle Eastern or other.
We shall not build up the free,
sovereign and independent Lebanon we want alone, but all its children,
both here in Lebanon and abroad all over the world, will also
participate with us in this process, together we shall all be
responsible for its defense, the orientation of its policy and the
organization of its administration.
The Lebanese Front believes in the
necessity of reconsidering the structural formula which has
determined the politics of Lebanon since 1943, with a view to
modifying it in such a way as to prevent any friction or clash between
the members of the same Lebanese family.
This reconsideration might issue in an
alteration of the structural formula into some kind of
decentralization or federation or confederation within a comprehensive
framework of a single unified Lebanon. Such has been the trend of the
modern constitutional systems throughout the world. The aim of the
alteration is to ensure that no disaster like the many disasters which
befell Lebanon since 1840 will recur in the future. The new formula
will be agreed upon among the Lebanese themselves in a climate devoid
of compulsion or intimidation, whether arising from within or without.
In the
determination of the principles of its existence, Lebanon will be
guided by the terms of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
especially with respect to the fundamental rights and freedoms of man.
III
Religious Freedoms
Lebanon's
principal concern is to ensure individual and group freedoms for all
its children and institutions.
Owing to the fact that the first
fundamental problem of the Middle East, as indeed of all Asia and
Africa, nay even of more than
Asia and
Africa, is the problem of minorities; and owing to the fact that the
fundamental minorities in the Middle East are religious minorities;
for these two reasons Lebanon is compelled, having regard to its
composition and history, to pay special attention to its religious
communities with a view to ensuring their freedoms.
Our aim
is that Lebanon enjoy the clear distinction of being the only country
in the Middle East in which the problem of minorities has received its
complete resolution.
There shall not be in the Lebanon we propose to build up any
discrimination or inequity against any one of its communities.
The Lebanon which has revolted against the perennial problem of
minorities in the Middle East shall not permit this problem to lift up
its head in it.
The Christian
society in Lebanon occupies a special position owing to the fact that
it has been free and has enjoyed a continuous history down the
centuries. For this reason the Lebanon we want to build up is anxious
that the Christians in it remain in fact free, secure and masters of
themselves and of their own values and destiny, exactly as Christians
are in any country in the world where they are in fact free, secure
and masters of themselves and of their own values and destiny. Lebanon
considers this charge as one of its most sacred trusts.
The
Christians of Lebanon do not want more for themselves than they want
for others, but at the same time, they do not accept less for
themselves than others want for themselves.
The freedom of the Christians in Lebanon is not to be confined to a
particular section of Lebanon only, but it must extend to every
Christian and every Christian society in all Lebanon.
The
freedom and security of the Christians in Lebanon, and their
mastery over themselves, their values and their destiny, do not depend
on any demographic consideration or any political orientation.
Most certainly the Lebanese Front does not understand by the
Christians of Lebanon the Maronites only, but all other Christian
communities which, by reason of their deeply rooted traditions and
their free development, since the days of Christ and since some of
them took refuge in this hospitable mountain, have contributed so much
to the flourishing of this special, distinctive civilization.
As to the
lacerative winds blowing upon the Maronite community today, the
Lebanese Front, while anxiously preoccupied with them, does not
consider them a concern that can possibly last.
For in the
face of the grim dangers now threatening us, the Front believes that
when every one of us rises above his own wound, we will then turn, all
of us, to the healing of Lebanon's wound. And we shall succeed in
healing it.
Moreover,
the Lebanese Front believes that the Christians, all of them, cannot
part from their brethren of the other minorities who have, for
hundreds of years, contributed with them to the formation of this
homeland, so unique and brave and with such a distinctive personality
of its own in the Middle East.
The
Lebanese Front believes that Lebanon is not a meeting place of two
great religions huddled together against their will, and therefore
forced to resort to all sorts of ruses and stratagems in order to
maintain a precarious mode of coexistence always subject to collapse
as each of them sharpens its own craving to dominate and rule. It
views Lebanon rather as a federation of communities comprising sixteen
minorities, all bent in a spirit of mutual trust and cooperation on
preserving, in the face of the overwhelming majority surrounding them
in the Middle East, the freedom, dignity and equality they all enjoy
in Lebanon, regardless of demographic and social inequalities that may
exist among them.
The maxim of the Lebanese Front in its
impartial and just view of all Lebanese is: no Lebanese is superior to
another except on the basis of his loyalty to Lebanon and to its
freedoms and values.
For it
holds the firm conviction that the guarantee of the survival of
Lebanon is not mere loyalty to Lebanon, but a loyalty infused with
love for Lebanon.
IV
The Peace of the
Middle East is Determined
by the Peace of Lebanon, and
the Peace of Lebanon is Determined by the
Peace of the Christians of Lebanon
The peace
of Lebanon is one of the keys to the peace of the Middle East. Peace
and stability cannot prevail in the Middle East so long as Lebanon is
shattered, politically and spiritually, and its peace shaken, troubled
and precarious. The instability of Lebanon means precisely the
instability of the Middle East.
If the
peace of Lebanon is one of the keys to the peace of the Middle East,
the fundamental key to the peace of Lebanon is for all the religious
societies of Lebanon to be free, happy, secure, at ease in their own
minds, and masters of themselves, their values and their destinies.
Whoever imagines that free Christianity
in Lebanon can be oppressed without producing a tremendous world
reaction and tremors of a fundamental revolutionary character all over
the Middle East, is misled and mistaken. Such a person does not know
either the power of freedom, or the truth of Christianity, or the
actual state of affairs and the histories of the peoples of the
region, or the inevitable development of their relations among
themselves in the future.
The future does not belong to oppression
but to liberation. The future will not bring about a contraction of
existing freedom but a widening of its scope. The future will not
conduce to the enlargement and grounding of slavery but to diminishing
its scope and getting rid of it altogether. The future does not belong
to discriminating against the religious minorities but to these
minorities themselves winning complete equality in their
responsibilities, rights and obligations. The future does not belong
to the realm of darkness but to the realm of the light which shone and
continues to shine in Lebanon.
If Christianity has been present and
active in the Eastern Mediterranean for 2,000 years without
interruption; if it is living and active, and shall remain living and
active, in the West; and if the Mediterranean has been throughout
history a living space for the West or the West for the Mediterranean;
then it is not reasonable for active Christianity to disappear today
from the Eastern Mediterranean. On the contrary, what is reasonable,
nay what is inevitable, is that Christianity shall deepen itself and
become more authentic in its action and freedom in the Eastern
Mediterranean.
V
Total Liberation from the Two
Occupations
The Syrian
occupation must be lifted. Every agreement of whatever kind arrived at
under the shadow of the bayonet cannot be a free agreement, and
therefore we consider it null and void.
Certainly No to
settling the Palestinians in Lebanon. This absolute rejection has been
embodied in all the previous statements of the Lebanese Front, and in
particular in the statement it issued on Tuesday, May 20, 1980, in
which it declared:
"The Front hastens to declare its total
rejection of any settlement of foreigners, particularly of
Palestinians, on any Lebanese territory, no matter how small in size
and wherever the settlement should take place. It intends to resort to
all means, no matter how onerous, to prevent this act of aggression
from taking place, an act that will have the effect of sealing the
fate of Lebanon from now."
The Lebanese Front has been pleased to note that the position
expressed by the Foreign Minister in the Government's statement before
the General Assembly of the United Nations on October 2, 1980
conformed to its views; we quote the following passage from this
statement:
"We wish to emphasize here what the
President of Lebanon said on more than one occasion: We absolutely
reject any project for the settlement of foreigners on Lebanese
territory, as well as every measure that may lead to such settlement,
whether directly or indirectly. We shall oppose any disguised project
of settlement in all its phases with every means at our disposal. This
opposition springs from our faith in our sacred right to our homeland,
a right which nobody shares with us. The land of Lebanon is not free
for all, neither is it a commodity offered for sale in auctions held
in some international bazaar."
It is precisely this absolute rejection
which every Lebanese shouts from the housetops with his deepest,
firmest and most strenuous voice.
From the outset we were determined to
nullify at any cost every project aiming at settling the Palestinians
in Lebanon.
All the sales or transfers of real
estate which occurred here and there with a view to enabling
Palestinians, whether directly or in some roundabout way, to own
Lebanese property, shall be abrogated.
For the land of Lebanon belongs to the
Lebanese only and there is no land in Lebanon for non Lebanese.
Likewise every illegal acquisition of
Lebanese nationality, regardless of who has acquired it, shall be
abrogated. Certainly No also to partition.
But with the
same strength and certainty, No to every measure that conduces, or
that might conduce, to the weakening of personal, existential, human,
responsible freedom.
The
reconciling of these two Noes, No to partition and No to the erosion
of responsible freedom, is the fateful desideratum at this critical
moment in the history of Lebanon.
VI
The Existence of Lebanon an Imperative
Necessity
Lebanon is a necessity for itself, an
Arab necessity, a Middle Eastern necessity, and a world necessity.
In all the sectors of its society,
Lebanon fought, is now fighting, and shall continue fighting; Lebanon
stood firm, is now standing firm, and shall continue standing firm;
all in defense of its existence and freedoms, and all for the
protection of its own values. Lebanon will not accept any encroachment
upon its freedoms and values, even if the whole world stood in its
face. And when the world wakes up from its slumber, it will appreciate
the greatness of Lebanon's dogged attachment to its values even to the
point of death, not only for itself, but indeed for the entire world.
And because Lebanon is an Arab
necessity, owing to the fact that its climate is the climate of
freedom, it devolves upon the Arab world to appreciate its situation
and do everything in its power, not to enfeeble it, or oppress it, or
curtail its vitality, or absorb it, but to vouchsafe for it the
assurance, in truth, that it is totally secure from any Arab or
Islamic peril, and to leave it to itself to develop in its own way
according to the pleasure and will of its own peoples.
The thought that the good of the Arabs
and Islam consists in assimilating and absorbing Lebanon, and that
"Lebanon is a thorn in the side of the Arab world" which must
disappear, is a false thought, let alone the fact that the realization
of this thought is impossible.
Again, because Lebanon is a Middle
Eastern necessity, owing to the fact, first, that the emergence of an
order of peaceful interaction among the peoples of the Middle East is
an inevitable development, and, second, that Lebanon is destined to
play an effective role in the midst of this order, it behooves all the
countries of the Middle East, including Turkey, Israel and Iran, to
reassure free, sovereign, independent, secure and healthy Lebanon
that, in truth, it is not in danger of extinction.
Finally, because Lebanon is a world
necessity, owing to the fact, first, that Lebanon in the essence of
its being is human and universal, as it has made, and continues to
make today, many contributions of a universal and human character,
principally in the domain of thought and of material and human
intercourse; second, that Lebanon serves as an authentic window at
once of the Middle East to the world and of the world to the Middle
East; and third, that Lebanon is a moderating and reconciling factor
among the peoples and civilizations of a region, the Middle East,
which has always displayed, and all the more displays today, a
universal world character, in relation to world religions, the economy
of the world, world strategy, and world history:
For all these reasons the whole world
must concern itself with Lebanon; it must even protect it; it must
realize that should Lebanon lose its freedom and its distinctive
identity with its universal character, its contribution would dry up
and the world itself as a result would lose a value unique and
irretrievable.
Consequently the Lebanese Front holds
that the interest of the whole world requires the world to rise to the
duty of providing this small‑great country, Lebanon, with formal,
actual and effective guarantees, to the end that Lebanon be assured a
firm existence in which it will be at once free and master of itself,
and therefore able to continue to carry out the message with which it
has been charged since the dawn of history.
If Lebanon is given these guarantees,
its mind will be set at ease, and it will then be free to act and
create; and if it is not given them, it will still act to be free in
order to create; and in any event, Lebanon will remain a distinctive
civilization by itself.
VII
Lebanon Universal and Human
In the essence
of its being, Lebanon is authentically rooted in the one universal
human civilization. It therefore rejects and resists every attempt at
tearing up its deep roots in this civilization. Indeed its continuous
historical existence is itself the expression of a firm will to this
rejection and resistance.
We likewise reject every attempt at
attenuating Lebanon's traditional existential relations with Europe
and the Western world in general. For down the centuries and
generations Lebanon has always acted on this world and interacted with
it, and we shall not accept in these last days cutting Lebanon off
from this world. Every attempt at this act of cutting Lebanon off from
the West we shall categorically reject.
The Lebanon we want to build will not
admit that any summit of thought or spirit in history and in the world
be not accessible to its children. Therefore Lebanon will design its
system of education on the basis of complete responsible openness to
all sources of reason and truth and spirit in history and the world.
We also reject every attempt at
weakening Lebanon's traditional free and creative interaction in all
fields with its Arab and Middle Eastern environments.
Finally, we reject every attempt at
severing the Lebanese overseas, whether sentimentally or culturally or
economically or politically or administratively, from Lebanon, their
fatherland. We aim, on the contrary, at making the relations between
Lebanon and the Lebanese overseas as intimate, solid and firm as
possible.
On the occasion
of the convening of the recent annual conference of the American
Lebanese League in Washington between October 18 and 20, 1980, we
commend the felicitous endeavors undertaken by the League with the
United States Government and the public opinion of America. We also
laud the constancy of its sound view of everything that pertains to
the essence and destiny of Lebanon.
We wish also to express on this occasion
our pleasure in the Second World Maronite Congress which was held in
New York between October 8 and 12, 1980, and to welcome the decisions
it took and the recommendations it formulated, notably:
the
affirmation of world Maronitism of its attachment to free, sovereign
and independent Lebanon;
the
affirmation of its rejection of every settlement of the Palestinians
on Lebanese territory; and
the
affirmation to His Holiness the Pope of the supreme human-world value
of free Lebanon.
Four factors
appearing on the horizon threaten, whether or not by design, to
rupture one or another of Lebanon's essential features:
rupturing
Lebanon from its deep and relatively unbroken roots throughout
history;
rupturing
Lebanon's intimate ties to the one human world civilization;
rupturing
Lebanon's creative interaction, or curtailing this interaction, with
its Arab and Middle Eastern environments, and
rupturing Lebanon's organic and living
ties with its children abroad throughout the world.
The Lebanon we want
to build rejects categorically all these four rupturings.
VII
The
New Lebanese Society
The new
society of the Lebanon we want to build shall be characterized by the
following features:
lofty
morals;
responsible
freedom;
truthfulness; respect for others;
placing the common good above the
individual good;
curbing material greed;
the supremacy of law;
promoting community spirit and
cohesiveness;
social justice;
enlarging the scope of social security,
and
the example of the leaders.
We shall endeavor to implant these
virtues, and all that goes with them, through the family, the school,
popular literature and art, the public media of information, social
intercourse, and the law.
IX
Addressing
the World
In the past the West used to understand the reality of Lebanon and to
take it seriously, but the West of today either does not understand it
or, if it does, turns its gaze away from it.
Owing, however, to the splendid steadfastness manifested by all
sectors of Lebanese society, the West lately appears to have renewed
its readiness to understand it.
It is this
indifferent, if not unfriendly, West whom we wish now to address.
We address the
states and peoples of the West, both west and east.
We address France
and the French people.
We
address West Germany and the West German people.
We address
Britain and the British people.
We address
Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg and their peoples.
We address Italy,
Spain, Greece, and Ireland and their peoples.
We address the
Scandinavian states and their peoples.
Then we address
the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the Latin
American world, all of which include great Lebanese communities ‑ we
address them all, governments and peoples.
We address these states and peoples in a
spirit of confidence and hope, because the systems, outlooks and
values of all of them are the same as our system, outlook and values
here in Lebanon. Their systems are democratic and free; our system,
too, is democratic and free. Their values are the values of freedom
and man, ours, too, are precisely the same.
We say to them
all:
"We are persuaded
that part of the responsibility for the havoc that has afflicted
Lebanon falls on your shoulders. You were for the most part spectators
and unconcerned, while it was within your power, if you mustered the
will, to contribute effectively to sparing us this ordeal, or at least
to reducing it to one tenth of its magnitude.
"We believe in the
same values in which you believe.
"These values are
integrated into our being as they are into yours.
"We fought and
are fighting and we died and are dying for the same outlook on life
for which you fought and are fighting and died and are dying.
"Our war is your
war and if we are overcome in it, we shall not be overcome alone: you
too will be overcome.
"Our survival is
your survival, and if we survive with our values in these parts, you
and your values will survive with us.
"We presume to
feel that we love the peoples of this region more than you do, for we
resolutely cling to the values we have been tending, values which were
ours before they became yours, and because the peoples hereabout are
in the most dire need for our unwavering living witness to them.
"The narrow and
grudging eye appears to have succeeded, in one of your uncritical
moments, in impressing upon you, falsely, the thought that your
interests cannot be safeguarded except by sacrificing our life of
dignity and mastery over our own destiny.
"The liberating of
yourselves from the sway of this grudging and sickly eye is indeed
your problem.
"Who painted to
you that our continuing to enjoy the fife of freedom in which, far
from inflicting any harm on anybody, we live, as we have been living
all along, at peace with everybody, conflicts with your interests?
“Where is your
freedom, where is your ancient and venerable tradition, where are your
authentic values, where is your foresight, where is the lofty
discrimination between spirit and matter which adorned the thinking of
your forefathers for centuries and centuries?
"We are
certain that the capabilities of your diplomacy can, provided the will
were forthcoming, felicitously and quite easily reconcile between
preserving all your vital interests in the Middle
East and our continuing to live a life
of freedom, dignity and mastery over our own values and destiny.
"Nay our
continuing to enjoy such a life serves to bolster up at once the
interests of the Middle East and your own interests in the Middle
East.
"We do not believe
that your diplomacy which succeeded in the past by its resourcefulness
and skill in overcoming a thousand and one conflicts, cannot now,
quite easily, discern and cancel out the spurious conflict between
your interests and our living a life of dignity and freedom,
Indeed, we
may have more confidence in you than you have in yourselves, for we
believe that someday you will wake up and appreciate the heroism of
our eternal tragic struggle in the defense of values which are exactly
your values as they are ours.
Then we turn, again with confidence and hope, to the Soviet Union and
the states which revolve in its orbit, and address them as follows:
"Our system is
different from your system and our outlook is different from your
outlook.
"But this
difference need not inhibit our interest in and understanding of one
another.
"How can you be
harmed if we preserve our system and values and do not threaten in the
slightest your systems and values?
"How can you be
harmed if we conduct transactions with you on the basis of mutual
respect, taking into account your and our interests, despite the
differences that may subsist between your and our systems and values?
" You conduct
transactions with systems other than your own precisely on this
basis.
"Some of your
values coincide with some of ours, and it is on the basis of this
common fund of values that we can meet.
"We are
confident we can understand your situations, and we trust it will be
possible for you also to understand ours. On the basis of this mutual
and tolerant comprehension we should be able, together, to build up
free, creative and sound relations with one another.
We shall never forget all those who
stood by our side in the tribulation that has befallen us.
And as we
belong to the group of states and peoples that labor in the vineyard
of man for the good of man and we are permanently committed to this
task, we shall persevere in cooperating intimately and energetically
with any state belonging to this group, until we pay every man our
debt to him, and every state the obligations we owe it, and until we
earn and justify our rightful place in the world.
X
A Call to the Lebanese People:
Total Confidence in the Future.
The Lebanese Front wishes to stress its
total confidence that the Lebanese people will overcome all
adversities and obstacles, no matter how complicated or tortuous or
obscure the path still before them may be. It bases this confidence on
the sturdiness manifested by our people throughout history, and on the
remarkable steadfastness which has characterized the Lebanese
Resistance, in all its sectors. in the ongoing events. This resistance
has offered, and shall continue to offer, almost superhuman
sacrifices. The Lebanese Front reaffirms its faith that Lebanon will
emerge from the fiery furnace in which it is being tried an oasis of
freedom, humanism, prosperity, openness, concord, joy and peace, as it
has always been in the past.
We now address
the Lebanese people of all persuasions:
"Doubtless you
recognize the voice addressing you. You are accustomed to hearing ft.
The same voice is now calling you.
"The Lebanon we want to build up belongs both to you and to
US.
"It is equally your home and our home, regardless of who builds more
in it, you or we.
"We have
willed it, both to you and to us, a sanctuary of pride, honor and
dignity, and a pasture in which freedom and well‑being can bask.
"You and we
are sick and tired of a foreigner who intrudes on our privacy, helps
himself to our livelihood, and violates our sacred honor;
“a foreigner
who destroys our institutions, our property and the sources of our
welfare and happiness, and who darkens what looms ahead of our days;
“a foreigner
who tries to topple our traditions and do away with our history;
“a refugee who
wants to reduce us, under his aegis, to refugees in our own country,
strangers in it and enemies unto himself.
"Finally, you
and we are sick and tired of a usurper who tries to add his name to
ours on the billboard of accomplishments which our efforts and
sacrifices and sufferings have pinned on the brow of Lebanon.
"The Lebanese
cause, which is your cause and ours, is a world cause. Its events
unfold themselves on Lebanese soil. While its solution can only be a
world solution, yet, whatever the solution might be, it can only be
effected through Lebanese hands.
"These hands are your
hands. They can convulse the entire world if they determine to
organize the vast Lebanese potential here and abroad methodically,
meticulously and responsibly, without allowing a single particle of it
to be dissipated.
"History is our witness that every
time we set our heart on something we attain it.
"We reap according to the abundance of our heart, and our heart is
full of matter and determination.
"No man full in his heart as we are can be excused if he is overcome
with fear or irresolution or even the frustration consequent upon
failure.
"Unite, and
you shall overcome.
“And, with
God's help, we shall overcome."
Camille
Chamoun Pierre Gemayel
Abbot Boulos Naaman
Charles
Malik Fouad Afram Boustany
Edouard Honein
|